Saturday, November 20, 2010

statements from Campaigns & Grey and the DoT Undersecretary

Here's the public statement from Campaigns and Grey.

Pilipinas Kay Ganda and Campaigns & Grey
"Campaigns & Grey was called by DOT for a new branding exercise. There was hesitation on our end as we were familiar with the complex bidding process, and we were still owed by the past administration for services rendered. our love for country prevailed. From the beginning, it was clear that the actual campaign would be bidded out and that our work was merely to establish preliminary strategic directions. But suddenly, there was a pressing need for exploratory concepts to be shown in some travel industry events. Again, we warned the client that we were taking too many shortcuts. But it was agreed that there will be a proper market research where multiple concepts will be thoroughly tested among the target market i.e. North America, Korea, Japan, China etc. Through this whole episode, we did not have a contract nor did we receive a single centavo.
Based on avalable market data, ‘Pilipinas Kay Ganda!’ was developed as one of the 5 concepts for testing among the market segments. The intention of this particular concept was to come up with a novel line that visitors would find memorable, similar to Hawaii’s ‘Aloha’, or even the Japanese ‘Irasshaimase!’ and help regain the Filipino pride in the long run.
From many different logo studies that we recommended, we were directed to use the Polska logo for inspiration. Again, this went through several revisions until the client approved a logo similar to the fonts of Polska. With the addition of several other Philippine elements like the tarsier, smiling coconuts and the sun, there was enough distinction to send the logo into market research.
We repeatedly warned the client that it was premature to launch, or even preview the study, but apprently, preparations for the tour operator event were already underway. we ourselves were shocked at the grand scale of what was supposed to be a mere glimpse to draw out a constructive exchange among industry partners. It was not surprising that media and the public took it as a done deal.
We shall take this experience as a cautionary tale against giving in to the client and allowing their over-enthusiasm to override our better judgement. It was a reminder that the road to perdition is paved with good intentions."

 In the meantime, here's DoT Undersecretary Vicente Romano's statement:

I am responsible for the choice of We were about to give a preview of “Pilipinas Kay Ganda” as the tourism country brand, and I was looking for an appropriate URL that would be associated with the new brand.
I searched and looked at all possible permutations of “beautiful”, “philippines”, “pilipinas”, “is beautiful”, and this was the best name that was still available.
Now, if you were the one tasked to do this and you finally chose, will you automatically check what was, especially since it was not even one of your candidate choices? Honestly? I didn't and am sorry for it.
But I think the bigger question is did it damage the reputation of our country? The categorical answer is NO, thanks to the vigilance of our twittering community. As soon as they pointed out the anomaly, we pulled out the site and it had a total exposure of no more than 14 hours. I doubt very much if any foreigner actually had a chance to see the porn site.
It may have caused the department embarrassment, but I don’t think it put our nation to shame.
Some time ago I mentioned that the budget of DOT for new media is from P60 to P100M. And some are asking, “is this all we get for P100M, with copies filled with typos and grammatical errors?”
Again, the answer is NO. The P60 to P100M new media budget is for 2011, and it will still be bidded out in 2011. To put it in perspective, Singapore spent the equivalent of P160 to P180M for the new media component of their new brand campaign.
We will spend it for the following:
  1. Complete overhaul of current website, with language translation and full features
  2. SEO /SEM (we want to make sure our destinations are on page 1 or 2 when googled for tourism-related keywords)
  3. SNS campaigns (FB, twitter, and you-tube campaigns, stand-alone or in support of offline campaigns)
  4. Interface platform to connect industry stakeholders (transport, resort  and hotel owners,  tour operators, etc.) with online booking capability
  5. Online advertising in relevant web properties was intended to be a facelift of the current site, in essence – an interim site. We just changed the look and feel, but literally cut-and-pasted from the different existing DOT websites.
I guess because the site was new, every page and every word was under close scrutiny.
So where do we go from here?
Since many of you in #helpDOT said you wanted to help… here’s the deal.
We will put up the website in a private URL. If you want to get involved,
  1. Send an email to and express your desire to volunteer.
  2. She can then give you the URL of the interim website
  3. Tell her (via email) the page you’d like to work on
  4. Submit a write-up (either as rewrite of existing one or an entirely new one) and/or a captioned photo or graphics design
  5. We will put your name as the contributor, both to give credit and assign accountability
  6. Of course, we will exercise editorial control throughout the whole process
This content will not only be useful for the interim website, but will also feed to whoever will win in the bidding to develop the full-featured website.
Think of it as the wiki-approach of building up our website.
God bless,

Gang T. Badoy

Everybody's a copywriter this week. Copywriter kay ganda.

So there. As Roger Rabbit would say, that's all folks!

1 comment:

  1. I think Campaigns & Grey should be black listed for hand washing and even blaming the client for its "plagiarism". To use the Polska logo for inspiration is not the same as to copy the style of the font. Pro bono or with pay that doesn't matter. The fact remains that it engaged itself in a creative services for DOT, it should be humble enough to admit authorship or, better, defend its creative flair.


What's your two-cents about this travel adventure and/or misadventure? Do leave a comment here. Thank you.